CDC says state spends less than 8% of what it should on preventing use of tobacco; companies spend 13 times as much

Kentucky spends only 7.6 percent of what it should spend on preventing the use of tobacco, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says in its latest annual report on the subject.

The state spent $4.33 million on tobacco-control programs in 2011, the year covered by the report. The CDC said spending of $57.2 million was called for, since 29 percent of Kentuckians smoked that year. Tobacco-related illnesses are estimated to cost Kentuckians $3.3 billion a year.

South Carolina and Texas, which spent 6.5 percent and 7 percent of the recommended amounts, were also singled out for criticism by the CDC. Nationally, states spend less than 18 percent of what they should, $3.7 billion, in the agency's view. "Only Alaska and North Dakota funded programs at the CDC-recommended levels, $10.7 million and $9.3 million, respectively," Samantha Ehlinger of McClatchy Newspapers reports.

Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2015/06/25/3918046/cdc-says-kentucky-isnt-spending.html#storylink=cpy

"States that made larger investments in tobacco prevention and control have seen larger declines in cigarettes sales than the United States as a whole, and the prevalence of smoking has declined faster as spending for tobacco control programs has increased," the CDC report said. "Evidence suggests that funding tobacco prevention and control efforts at the levels recommended . . . could achieve larger and more rapid reductions in tobacco use and associated morbidity and mortality."

In contrast to the state spending of $658 million on tobacco control, tobacco companies spent more than 13 times as much on advertising and promotion in 2011: $8.8 billion, or $24 million per day, the report noted.

"During the same period, more than 3,200 youth younger than 18 years of age smoked their first cigarette and another 2,100 youth and young adults who are occasional smokers progressed to become daily smokers," the report said. "If current rates continue, 5.6 million Americans younger than 18 years of age who are alive today are projected to die prematurely from smoking-related disease. However, the tobacco-use epidemic can be markedly reduced by implementing interventions that are known to work."

For the CDC's latest comprehensive report on tobacco use in Kentucky, with data from 2012, click here. For county-by-county figures on adults smoking in Kentucky in 2011-13, click here.

KentuckyOne Health turns down ethics panel's request to remove or change cancer treatment banner advertisement

A Louisville cancer center features a giant banner that says: "FIGHT CANCER WITH 5 or FEWER TREATMENTS." The treatment, called CyberKnife and performed at the James Graham Brown Cancer Center, is a procedure that directs large doses of radiation accurately to tumors, but it only works for small, isolated tumors, Andrew Wolfson reports for The Courier-Journal.

Dr. Anthony Zietman, associate director of the Harvard Radiation Oncology residence program at Boston's Massachusetts General Hospital, agreed the banner is accurate but said it is misleading, falsely implying CyberKnife can cure cancer. "For the right person, it is a great treatment, but the banner implies it is for everyone," he told Wolfson, adding that fewer than 20 percent of cancer patients at his hospital are eligible for stereostatic radiosurgery treatment.

The University of Louisville Hospital's ethics committee voted unanimously on May 20 to request that KentuckyOne Health remove the banner or change it to give more context. "It is false and misleading advertising," said Dr. Larry Florman, a plastic and reconstructive surgeon who sits on the committee, which includes doctors, nurses and clergy. "It's almost like a scam."

The committee said in an email to KentuckyOne that cancer patients receiving traditional therapy were asking why their treatment included more than five sessions and why they couldn't receive CyberKnife treatments instead. KentuckyOne spokesman David McArthur said after talking with the chairman of the U of L Department of Radiation Oncology and examining clinical results, "We decided that keeping the banner in place is appropriate."

McArthur also noted that CyberKnife can fight cancer after just five or fewer treatments and that in almost three years, "all patients treated with it at the cancer center have received one to five treatments," Wolfson writes. "More than half were treated for metastatic cancer—cancer that had spread." McArthur added, "In the spirit of collaboration, we are looking for additional ways to ensure potential patients have the appropriate information to understand if CyberKnife is the right treatment for them."

Accuray is the Sunnyvale, Calif., company that makes CyberKnife. The company says the therapy is non-invasive and painless. In 2001, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the system for use in any organ, including the prostate, lung, brain, spine, liver, pancreas and kidney.

Fayette County Board of Health wants to regulate electronic cigarettes, raising some questions

The Lexington-Fayette County Board of Health is discussing ways to restrict the use of electronic cigarettes in public places and strategies to inform people about their potential dangers, Mary Meehan writes for the Lexington Herald-Leader. This continues not only the debate about whether or not e-cigarettes should be regulated the same way as traditional tobacco products but also how much power health boards may have in such matters.

E-cigarettes are battery-powered, and the liquid nicotine turns to vapor that can be inhaled. Though they don't contain tobacco, nicotine is sometimes used as a pesticide and can be harmful to humans as well. The General Assembly recently passed a law regulating e-cigarette sales, making them illegal to minors. The Danville City Commission has already banned the indoor use of e-cigarettes. “The state now classifies them as a tobacco product. What makes them different? By our ordinance, there is no distinction,” City Manager Ron Scott said.

Sometimes advertisements make it seem as though e-cigarettes are a safe alternative to traditional smoking, Meehan writes. Fayette Health Board Chairman Scott White, an attorney, noted that some e-cigarette flavors, such as bubble gum, target children. "If marketing a deadly product to children isn't evil, I don't know what is," he said. "We have enough history with the tobacco industry to know we need to get ahead of this."

Some think e-cigarettes can help people quit smoking, but that hasn't been proven. More research is still needed. Also, even if e-cigarettes help some people quit smoking, they may be a "gateway drug" to others.

The board may change "Lexington's current smoking ban to include e-cigarettes" and create "a public education campaign," Meehan reports. It's unclear how the board would do that, since the ban was passed by the Urban County Council. Also, the state Supreme Court recently ruled that health boards couldn't pass smoking bans, and it's unclear whether that decision would come into play.

Ellen Hahn, director of Kentucky Center for Smoke-Free Policy, told Meehan it would be best to "include electronic cigarettes in smoke-free laws because they are a tobacco product, and they pollute the air," Meehan writes. "E-cigarettes give off tiny particles that can lodge in the lungs and cause disease."

Though public health departments are helping reduce smoking rates in Kentucky, the "rates remain high, with about 29 percent of adults smoking and approximately 18 percent of people younger than 18," Meehan reports. "The state has also reported a leap in nicotine poisonings, and that leap has been tied to e-cigarettes." (Read more)