Higher-income Kentuckians' reported health keeps declining; reports from those with lower incomes go up, marginally

A statewide poll again finds that Kentuckians with higher incomes consider themselves in better health than those with lower incomes.

The latest Kentucky Health Issues Poll, taken Oct. 8 through Nov. 6, found that 55 percent of Kentucky adults who are above 200 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) said their health was either "excellent" or "very good," compared to 29 percent of Kentucky adults at or below 200 percent of the FPL. The FPL for a family of four in 2014 was $47,700.

However, the percentage of Kentucky adults in the higher-income category reporting excellent or very good health has dropped significantly since the poll started asking this question in 2008, to 55 percent in 2014 from 66 percent in 2008. So has the overall percentage of Kentucky adults reporting excellent or very good health, dropping to 41 percent in 2014 from 49 percent in 2008.

The percentage of lower-income Kentucky adults reporting excellent or very good has been about the same since 2008. This year the poll found a 3 percent increase among those in this group who reported very good or excellent health. The difference is not statistically significant, but coincides with implementation of federal health reform, and and if it continues could show the law's impact.

The poll also found that 52 percent of adults age 45 and younger considered their health as excellent or very good while 33 percent of those over age 45 reported excellent or very good health.

“KHIP provides important data regarding the connections among a person’s age, earnings level and perceived health status,” said Susan Zepeda, president and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, which co-sponsored the poll. “By asking the same question year to year, we can spot trends in perceived health. The latest results are an important reminder of the links between poverty and poor health.”

The poll is conducted by the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Cincinnati and is co-sponsored by Interact for Health, formerly the Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati. It surveyed a random sample of 1,597 adults via land lines and cell phones, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points. That applies to each figure, making the 3 percent difference statistically insignifcant.

New diabetes cases in expanded-Medicaid states much higher than other states; 46,000 new Ky. Medicaid clients got screened

By Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

New diabetes cases among poor Americans are much more numerous in Kentucky and other states that have embraced the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a medical testing company has found. The diagnoses rose 23 percent in the Obamacare states and barely rose in the others, apparently because state Medicaid programs are encouraging screening for diabetes.

Quest Diagnostics conducted the study by analyzing laboratory test results from all 50 states and the District of Columbia in its large database over two six-month periods, Sabrina Tavernise reports for The New York Times. The authors determined that because in January 2014, 26 states and the District of Columbia had expanded Medicaid and 24 had not, it was a good time to conduct this study, which is reported in the journal Diabetes Care.

The research team used the results of the basic test for diabetes, which measures a form of hemoglobin that has interacted with glucose, A1c. "In the states that expanded Medicaid, the number of Medicaid enrollees with newly identified diabetes rose by 23 percent, to 18,020 in the first six months of 2014, from 14,625 in the same period in 2013," Tavernise reports. "The diagnosis rose by only 0.4 percent — to 11,653 from 11,612 — in the states that did not expand Medicaid."

A Kentucky study indicates that more screening isn't the only reason for such numbers; the Medicaid expansion population appears to be more susceptible to diabetes than normal.

The study by Deloitte Consulting found that chronic conditions, including diabetes, were more than twice as prevalent in the expansion population than other people of the same age and gender who were on Medicaid before it expanded. That comparative group was considered to be the group most similar to the Medicaid expansion population, since the state lacks historical data for the expansion group.

The study found that the Medicaid expansion group had a 102.5 percent higher prevalence of diabetes than the comparative group. About two of every 1,000 in the expansion group had diabetes, compared to one of every 1,000 members of the traditional-Medicaid group.

About 46,000 of the 400,000 people in the expansion group had a diabetes screening in the first year of the expansion. Both studies suggest better access and utilization of preventive care and early diagnosis will promote earlier treatment and better long-term outcomes.

Kentucky ranks 17th among the states in prevalence of diabetes, according to the 2014 "States of Obesity" report.  The state Cabinet for Health and Family Services reports an estimated 233,000 adult Kentuckians have pre-diabetes. For county-by-county data on diabetes, click here.

Quest Diagnostics recognized that its study only looked at changes in raw numbers of the lab results from one company and did not have access to a federal data set. This has caused some to voice skepticism that the study results are a result of the Medicaid expansion. Others, while recognizing that the study did not "have the precision of a scientific drug trial," Tavernise writes, said "the changes in the numbers are real ... 23 percent versus zero," and that "the health-care law was the most plausible explanation for the findings." Another said, "for an observational study, it’s really very strong."

Kentucky Health News is an independent news service of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues, based in the School of Journalism and Telecommunications at the University of Kentucky, with support from the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

Auditor will hold meetings in Prestonsburg, Princeton and Sonerset to discuss his report on financial status of rural hospitals

State Auditor Adam Edelen will hold three public meetings in rural communities to discuss the findings of his special report about the financial health of rural hospitals.

The meetings will be held Monday, April 21 at 1 p.m. at the Mountain Arts Center in Prestonsburg; Monday, May 4 at 11 a.m. (CT) at the Caldwell County Memorial Hospital in Princeton; and Thursday, May 6 at 1 p.m. at the Liberty center of Somerset Community College.

The report, which covers fiscal years 2011 through 2013, found that as many as one-third of Kentucky's rural hospitals were in poor financial shape, with 68 percent of them ranking below the national average financially.

“Although closure may be an unfortunate reality for some," Edelen said in the press conference, "I believe more can and should be done to help these hospitals rethink their models of business in delivering health care in the 21st century." He went on to suggest rural hospitals consider hiring outside managers, merge with larger hospitals, form coalitions with other rural hospitals or find a specialized health niche as possible alternate business models to consider.

The report calls for the creation of a state work group to monitor rural hospitals, including making sure state law gives them the flexibility to retool their business models. Susan Zepeda, president and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, suggested that the proposed work "could be incorporated into the work already under way under a State Innovation Model grant, which is engaging many sectors of health service in Kentucky in an ambitious, collaborative redesign effort."

Edelen said some of the primary problems faced by rural hospitals stem from the many changes in health care since the inception of Medicaid managed care, a decrease in the number of health-care providers, and an economic climate in some areas that doesn't support the current health payment model, which depends on the majority of its users to have private health insurance.

The report suggested that the Cabinet for Health and Family Services negotiate better contracts with managed-care organizations as it approaches the June 30 deadline, especially to address provider payments, stricter penalties for non-compliance and increased administrative burdens that managed care has put on hospitals. Edelen and Haynes sounded hopeful that this was going to happen.

Gov. Steve Beshear called Edelen's report "a dated snapshot" because the 2013 data used in the report does not include 2014 information,when the federal health reform was fully implemented through expansion of Medicaid to people with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty line. Beshear said hospitals received $506 million to care for such people in 2014 while seeing significant reductions in losses on patients who couldn't or wouldn't pay.

Edelen's spokeswoman, Stephenie Hoelscher, said in an email that Edelen believes the full effect of all the changes in health care to hospitals' bottom line is still not clear, and his report establishes a baseline for critical analysis going forward.

Plight of woman needing lung transplant, who has fallen through the cracks of the health-care system, gets attention from CNN

Update: CNN reports that Kentucky issued a Medicaid provider number to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and the hospital confirmed that they now have enrolled in Kentucky Medicaid and are working to complete the enrollment of some of their physicians, all of which helps clear the way for Katie Prager to get her lung transplant.  "Kentucky Medicaid executives are helping us to get this done in a streamlined fashion that overcomes previous administrative hurdles and misunderstandings in this complex case," Wendy Zellner, a spokeswoman for UPMC, told CNN. Dalton, Katie's husband, has since been discharged from the Pittsburgh hospital where he received his lung transplants in November and has returned to Kentucky. CNN reports Katie and Dalton were only able to communicate through the doorway of her University of Kentucky hospital room because of his risk of getting Katie's infection, which could kill him.

A 24-year-old Kentucky woman with cystic fibrosis who needs a lung transplant to live is caught in the middle of a financial and policy battle among Medicare, Medicaid, a state agency and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, one of only two hospitals in the United States qualified to do lung transplants on patients with her specialized condition.

Prager at University of Kentucky hospital (Image from CNN)

"I feel like they're putting a dollar sign on my life," Katie Prager of Ewing, in Fleming County, told CNN. "I don't want to die because of money. That's stupid. Nobody should have to do that." Katie's story was first reported by The Ledger Independent of Maysville and excerpted in Kentucky Health News.

Katie longs to be with her husband, Dalton Prager, but can't until she gets her lung transplant because in addition to cystic fibrosis, she has an infection, Burkholderia cepacia, that is "horribly dangerous" to him, Elizabeth Cohen and John Bonifield report for CNN. Dalton, who also has cystic fibrosis, received his lung transplants Nov. 17 at the Pittsburgh hospital, and the immunity-suppressing drugs he takes for the transplants make him highly vulnerable to infection.

"I just want to make it to see our four-year anniversary in July and be able to hold hands and just hug. That's all I really want -- to be able to hug my husband on our fourth anniversary," Katie told CNN.

Katie and Dalton met on Facebook in 2009 when they were 18 and Dalton lived in Missouri and Katie in Kentucky. And though Katie's doctors had warned her many times that it was dangerous to be around other CF patients because of the risk of shared infections, Katie decided to meet Dalton, even after he had told her he had Burkholderia cepacia, CNN reports. They married two years later.

Photo from CNN

"I told Dalton I'd rather be happy -- like really, really happy -- for five years of my life and die sooner than be mediocre happy and live for 20 years," she told CNN. "That was definitely something I had to think about, but when you have those feelings, you just know."

Their health "quickly deteriorated, and within months, they went on oxygen full time" and had to quit work, CNN reports. They entered the Pittsburgh hospital together in August 2014 to wait for new lungs. Dalton got his in November; Katie is still waiting.

One month after Dalton got his transplants, UPMC discharged Katie because they told her "It would be psychologically good for her to get out for a while," she told CNN. After only three days out she began to have "serious trouble breathing" and tried to go back into the hospital, but was told she could not return because "she had used up her supply of Medicare days."

Medicare wouldn't pay for another hospitalization until Katie had been out of the hospital for 60 days. She is too sick to do that, and has since been a patient at the University of Kentucky, where she relies on the federal-state Medicaid program for the poor and disabled to pay for her care, and doctors have predicted that she won't live a year without new lungs, CNN reports.

Medicaid cannot pay the Pittsburgh hospital because it is not in the state's network of health-care providers. CNN reports that Katie's doctor wrote a letter to Medicaid begging them to make an exception, but the state denied his plea. In a statement to CNN, a spokeswoman for the state Cabinet for Health and Family Services said the hospital had declined to enroll as a Kentucky Medicaid provider. "Medicaid policies allow for a simplified enrollment process for out-of-state providers in such situations," Gwenda Bond, spokeswoman for the cabinet wrote, offering to expedite their application when they choose to sign up.

Hospital officials counter that Kentucky officials said they would have to "sign up hundreds of their doctors to accept Kentucky Medicaid patients," which hospital spokeswoman Wendy Zellner said is "an unusually restrictive approach and contrary to single-case agreements that we have signed with other state Medicaid programs. . . . It is up to Kentucky Medicaid to address this situation."

Katie has also since had a discussion with a federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services caseworker that "didn't go very well," CNN reports. Katie told CNN that the caller was "rude, mean, and angry" and "acted like it was just a pain to have to be talking to me," but said "she would look into her situation." On April 1, CMS spokesman Aaron Albright told CNN that the federal agency was "reaching out to the state agency," and later in the day Zellner said the state agency "has reached out to us to talk. So stay tuned."

The news cheered the Pragers, who continued to talk via Skype and work on their fundraising Facebook page, while dreaming of a future together, CNN reports.

Study of poor but healthy Appalachian counties aims to find community-based approaches to improving the region's health

Though some people equate Appalachian areas with poverty, David Krol seeks to "shine a light" on a different picture—one that reflects "how health can flourish across Appalachia," despite data that confirms economic hardship, Krol writes for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

While Krol was reviewing the Appalachian Regional Commission's county-based economic data, which compares economic indicators like poverty and unemployment rates with national averages and then ranks each county, it occurred to him to overlay this county index with the annual County Health Rankings.

For the most part, Krol said he found what he expected, "that the most economically distressed counties in Appalachia would also be in the lowest quartiles of health outcomes and factors for their state." But some counties that were economically distressed ranked in the top quarter of their state in health factors and outcomes.

"What was it about Wirt County, West Virginia; Pickett County, Tennessee; and Oktibbeha County, Mississippi, that helped them overcome significant economic challenges towards better health outcomes when similarly distressed counties in the same state did not?" he wrote.

The need to know why these "unexpected outliers" occurred has prompted Krol, with the help of the ARC and the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, to study how these counties have accomplished this and to look at whether this could be re-created in similar communities.

"This approach is rooted in the belief that communities have the best solutions to the problems they face—as opposed to solutions driven by outside experts," he wrote.

It’s an opportunity to “go beyond the data.. to community conversations about what’s important,” Susan Zepeda, CEO of the foundation, told Krol.

Krol wrote, "Quantitative data can get only get us so far—it’s up to us to ask those critical questions of “Why? How? What can be done? It’s up to us to turn data into action."