Showing posts with label Affordable Care Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Affordable Care Act. Show all posts

Friday, July 3, 2015

Ky.'s pro-Obamacare policies led to more enrollment and support for it, but many poor are still uninsured and under-informed

Update: This story was updated to reflect the study's results for those who said they were hurt  by and not directly impacted by the ACA. 

State policy appears to have a major impact on poor people's thinking about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as well as how they describe their experience with it, according to a Harvard University study published in the journal Health Affairs.

The study surveyed nearly 3,000 low-income residents in three Southern states that had varying approaches to the ACA and its implementation: "Kentucky, which expanded Medicaid, created a successful state marketplace, and supported outreach efforts; Arkansas, which enacted the private option and a federal-state partnership marketplace, but with legislative limitations on outreach; and Texas, which did not expand Medicaid and passed restrictions on navigators" who help people with the federal and state marketplaces.

The survey found that Kentucky, which has enrolled more than 500,000 people in Medicaid and another 109,000 in private health plans through the Kynect health-insurance exchange, had the highest success in application rates, successful enrollments and positive experiences with the ACA, followed by Arkansas and then Texas.

"This corresponds to the general pattern of state-level engagement and support for the ACA coverage expansions in these three states," the researchers write.

The study also found that limited awareness and poor information continue to be two of the greatest barriers to the ACA. Even in Kentucky, where awareness was the highest, only half of the poor people surveyed said they had heard "some" or "a lot" about the ACA's coverage options. About 10 percent of Kentuckians remain without health insurance.

Another barrier to applying for coverage was the perception that it would cost too much, but for those with incomes below 138 percent of poverty in states that have expanded Medicaid, coverage is available without having to pay a premium.

"This adds to previous evidence that information gaps about the law remain a major challenge, particularly among low-income populations who likely have the most to gain from the coverage expansions," the researchers write.

The study also found that application assistance from navigators and others was the strongest predictor of enrollment, increasing enrollment to 93.1 percent from 84.9 percent. Application assistance was most common in Kentucky (46.2 percent) and least common in Texas (31.9 percent). Navigators help consumers choose health-insurance plans to meet their needs and assist them with the application process.

Kentucky reported an overall better application experience than the other two states in the study, and had a significantly higher enrollment rate (92.4 percent) than Arkansas (87 percent) and Texas (84.8 percent).

The study found that advertising about the law didn't seem to affect whether people applied for coverage or enrolled in a plan. However, ads were strongly associated with perceptions of the law.

About 20 percent of respondents said they had read or heard more negative ads and approximately 12 percent recalled more positive ads, and two-thirds said ads were about equal. (Negative ads were most frequently reported in Arkansas, where Obamacare was an issue in a U.S. Senate race last year.)

Twice as many respondents felt that the ACA had helped them as hurt them, although the majority reported no direct impact. In Kentucky, 40 percent said it had helped them, 12 percent said it had hurt them and 48 percent said it had not impacted them directly;  In Arkansas, 30 percent said it had helped them, 17 percent said it had hurt them and 54 percent said it had not impacted them directly; and in Texas, 21 percent said it had helped them, 14 percent said it had hurt them and 66 percent said it had not directly impacted them.

"Nonetheless, 48 to 66 percent of low-income adults in all three states felt the law had not directly impacted them in 2014," the researchers wrote, "which suggests that the ACA has not yet reached many who might benefit from it."

Sunday, June 28, 2015

More dental patients using ERs, showing lack of dental coverage, shortage of dentists and the stepchild status of oral health

More patients are going to hospital emergency rooms for dental care, illustrating how oral health remains the stepchild of the health system despite health-care reform.

"An analysis of the most recent federal data by the American Dental Association shows dental ER visits doubled from 1.1 million in 2000 to 2.2 million in 2012, or one visit every 15 seconds, Laura Ungar reports for The Courier-Journal and USA Today.

Christopher Smith of Jeffersonville, Ind., had a dental
infection that put him in a Louisville hospital for a
week. (Courier-Journal photo by Sam Upshaw Jr.)
"This is something I deal with daily," Dr. George Kushner, director of the oral and maxillofacial surgery program at the University of Louisville, told Ungar. "People still die from their teeth in the U.S."

A longstanding federal law requires ERs to treat patients regardless of their ability to pay. "Although they often provide little more than painkillers and antibiotics to dental patients, the visits cost more than three times as much as a routine dental visit, averaging $749 if the patient isn't hospitalized — and costing the U.S. health care system $1.6 billion a year," Ungar reports.

Private dental insurance is not common. "Just over a third of working-age adults nationally, and 64 percent of seniors, lacked dental coverage of any kind in 2012, meaning they had to pay for everything out of pocket," Ungar writes. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act "requires health plans to cover dental services for children but not adults," and "Medicare generally doesn't cover dental care at all," she notes.

In Kentucky, the expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare has increased dental visits in the program by 37 percent, but it offers "only a short list of dental services," such as extractions, which patients often choose instead of restorative work, for which they would have to pay.

Another big issue is that many dentists don't accept Medicaid, which pays them only 41 percent of private reimbursement, Ungar reports. Also, Kentucky has a shortage of dentists. "A 2013 workforce study by Deloitte Consulting found the state needs 612 more to meet demand," Ungar notes.

More dentists would encourage more preventive treatment, which dentists say would save a lot of money. "If we were going to the dentist more often, we could avoid a lot of this," Dr. Ruchi Sahota, a California dentist and consumer adviser for the ADA, told Ungar. "Prevention is priceless."

Fewer than 60 percent of Kentuckians saw a dentist in 2013, making their dental-visit frequency 43rd in the nation, according to the Kentucky Health Issues Poll.

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Supreme Court upholds Obamacare subsides in all states; ruling has no direct effect on Kentucky, but focuses political debate

By Molly Burchett
Kentucky Health News

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the tax subsidies provided under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act are legal in every state.

While the ruling has no effect on Kentucky, and would have had no direct effect if it had gone the other way, it sets the table for continued political debate about health policy in Congress and in Kentucky's race for governor.

"Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the 6-3 majority opinion. "If at all possible, we must interpret the Act in a way that is consistent with the former, and avoids the latter."

The law says the federal government can pay subsidies to help people afford insurance bought through “an Exchange established by the State.” The lawsuit argued that Americans in the 34 states using the federal exchanges were not eligible for the subsidies, which are crucial to the law's success, helping to make health insurance more affordable, reducing the number of uninsured Americans. Proponents of the law say not providing subsidies to individuals in those 34 states relying on the federal exchange would have upended the law, notes CNN.

President Obama called on critics to accept the law as permanent, saying after the ruling, "The Affordable Care Act is here to stay."

But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called Obamacare “a rolling disaster for the American people,” with a “multitude of broken promises, including the one that resulted in millions of Americans losing the coverage they had and wanted to keep. Today’s ruling won’t change the skyrocketing costs in premiums, deductibles, and co-pays that have hit the middle class so hard over the last few years.”

Maps: Percentage uninsured in 2012, above, and 2014, below
Obama countered, "The setbacks I remember clearly. But as the dust has settled, there can be no doubt that this law is working. It has changed, and in some cases saved, American lives. It set this country on a smarter, stronger course." He added, "The law has helped hold the price of health care to its slowest growth in 50 years" and "Nearly one in three Americans who was uninsured a few years ago is insured today. The uninsured rate in America is the lowest since we began to keep records."

A White House fact sheet noted that the law also expanded "access to preventive care, including immunizations, well-child visits, certain cancer screenings, and contraceptive services, with no additional out-of-pocket costs as well as no more annual caps on essential benefit coverage and new annual limits on out-of-pocket costs."

Since Kentucky established its own exchange, Kynect, for buying subsidized health insurance or signing up for Medicaid, the ruling may seem moot for Kentuckians. However, it establishes some of the facts for a health-care policy debate in the governor's race between Republican Matt Bevin and Democratic Attorney General Jack Conway.

The exchanges and the expansion of the federal-state Medicaid program are choices for the states, and Bevin has said that if elected he would shut down Kynect and end the Medicaid expansion, which has covered about 430,000 Kentuckians. The federal government is paying their entire cost through next year; in 2017 the state would start picking up a small share, rising to the law's limit of 10 percent in 2020.

Conway has acknowledged questions about whether the state can afford to pay its share, but to “say you’re going to kick a half a million people off of health insurance based on what we may or may not be able to afford in 2021 is irresponsible.” A Conway spokesman said he "appreciates the court's careful consideration of this case and agrees with today's decision," reports the Lexington Herald-Leader.

The Herald-Leader's Mary Meehan interviewed officials and experts for a package of questions and answers about the law and Kentucky. It is published at http://www.kentucky.com/2015/06/25/3917832_in-light-of-the-supreme-court.html.

Outgoing Gov. Steve Beshear, a Democrat who expanded Medicaid, said in a statement that the decision “reaffirms that, from the very start, we did the right thing for the more than 500,000 Kentuckians who have qualified for health-care coverage through Kynect since January 1, 2014.”

Susan Zepeda, president and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, said in a release, "While many have been awaiting this important decision, we must remember that much remains to be done to assure that all Kentuckians – and all Americans – have timely access to safe, effective and affordable quality care." Zepeda said Kentuckians continue to work on ways to improve and protect Kentuckians' health, such as reforming the way we pay for care and making health care cost and pricing more transparent.

"As people who have forgone care too long because of its expense now gain access to care, it will place a larger short-term burden on the health-care system, which approaches like these can help to address," said Zepeda. "The Affordable Care Act permits – and incentivizes – local health care innovation. We can and must shape Kentucky solutions to Kentucky’s health challenges."

Aetna is close to a deal to buy Humana, Bloomberg reports

Getty Images, via CNBC
Health insurer Aetna "is said to be closing in on a deal to buy" Louisville-based Humana Inc., Julie Hyman reports for Bloomberg News, "and a deal could come "as soon as this weekend."

Humana is also expecting an offer from Cigna Inc., but Humana's board of directors "prefers the Aetna offer," Hyman reports, citing unnamed people familiar with the negotiations. The deal has been discussed for weeks, but Aetna didn't make a formal proposal until this week.

The last major obstacle to a deal may have been the Supreme Court's ruling today that people in all states are entitled to tax subsidies for health insurance under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Hyman suggests, noting higher stock prices for health-insurance companies.

"Shares of Humana rallied more than 8 percent after trading was briefly halted for volatility," Reem Nasr of CNBC reports.

Humana is an attractive buy because "a great deal of its business — 73 percent of its premiums revenue — comes from contracts with the federal government," David Mann reports for Louisville Business First. "That means Humana is flush with Medicare business, which is a fast-growing category in the industry as many baby boomers are reaching the eligibility age. Its competitors, including Aetna, don't have nearly as much of this business."

"Consolidation among the country's top insurers follows a massive consolidation among providers in pharmacy, hospital and patient care, which has increased the leverage against insurers like Humana and Aetna," Grace Schneider reports for The Courier-Journal.

Thursday, June 11, 2015

Bevin says he will end all Obamacare programs in Ky., including Medicaid expansion that has added more than 400,000 to rolls

Matt Bevin, the Republican nominee for governor, has made clear that if elected he would end the Medicaid expansion that has provided free health coverage for more than 400,000 poor Kentuckians.

During his primary campaign, Bevin never made that quite plain, saying he would close the state's health-insurance exchange, Kynect, because it would cost "hundreds of millions of dollars." Kynect is paid for by insurance companies, so Bevin was alluding to to the state's projected cost of expanding Medicaid, which enrolls through Kynect.

The Washington-based publication Politico reported on June 10, after interviewing Bevin, that he would not only close Kynect but roll back the Medicaid expansion: “You may or may not have access to Medicaid going forward,” he said. “People are not on it for extended periods of time. It’s not meant to be a lifestyle. It really isn’t. The point of it is to provide for those who truly have need.”

Democratic nominee and Attorney General Jack Conway, with Gov.
Steve Beshear; GOP nominee Matt Bevin (AP photos via Politico)
Gov. Steve Beshear "is furious" about Bevin's plan, Politico reported. “I am not going to allow someone to become governor of this state who wants to take us back to the 19th century,” the governor said in a telephone interview. “For a serious candidate for governor to be advocating a simple repeal of the whole program without offering any kind of alternative which will continue health care for these people is irresponsible.”

Beshear expanded the eligibility rules for Medicaid as part of implementing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, raising the income limit to the law's required 138 percent of the federal poverty level, from the state's previous level of 69 percent.

The federal government is paying the entire cost of the newly eligible Medicaid recipients though next year. In 2017, the state would begin to pay 3 percent, rising to the reform law's cap of 10 percent by 2020. A study by Deloitte Consulting and the Urban Institute at the University of Louisville  — "which Republican critics have rejected as spin," Politico says — has said the expansion more than pays for itself through 2020 by expanding health-care jobs and generating tax revenue.

Jobs are growing as projected by the study, according to the Cabinet for Health and Family Services, which handles Medicaid.

Cabinet spokeswomnan Jill Midkiff said the study estimated that 32,000 jobs would be created through 2015 as a result of the expansion. "U of L projected this growth would primarily be in the areas of retail trade, finance and insurance, administrative services, health and social services, accommodations and food services and other services," Midkiff said. "These sectors were estimated to account for more than 28,000 of the 32,000 jobs created." She said the latest Bureau of Labor Statistics figures show that "these sectors have grown by more than 29,000 jobs from 2013 until April 2015. Therefore, the most recent BLS numbers indicate that UofL’s estimates are on target to meet projections."

Politico says a Bevin victory could "blot an Obamacare bright spot," since Kynect has "worked virtually glitch-free." Through April, 106,000 Kentuckians had obtained tax-subsidized, private insurance coverage through Kynect, which is also the portal for enrolling in Medicaid.

Bevin says he would move those people to the federal exchange, which has been marred by technological issues and charges insurance companies much more to use it than Kynect does. But that plan would not work if the U.S. Supreme Court rules this month that the tax subsidies are not legally available through the federal exchange.

"That doesn’t worry Bevin," Politico reports, quoting him: “You’re worrying about a hypothesis. Let’s let the Supreme Court rule.”

And what about the new Medicaid recipients who would lose their benefits if Bevin wins? He "insists that Obamacare is coverage in name only — that Kentuckians still lack access to high-quality health care, partly because Medicaid pays doctors such low rates, partly because he says too many people rely on emergency rooms," Politico reports, quoting him: “Just having health insurance doesn’t mean you’re going to get health care.”

Attorney General Jack Conway, the Democratic nominee, declined Politico's request for an interview. Campaign spokesman Daniel Kemp said, “Jack wants to make sure that the hundreds of thousands of Kentuckians who now have health insurance through Kynect, especially kids, keep their health insurance — not play politics or push an ideology that’s out of touch with Kentucky’s values.”

Politico observes, "Conway is in the tricky spot of embracing Kynect while trying to keep his distance from Obama and Obamacare, a term that still generates ire among Kentucky residents. A September 2014 Marist [College] poll found that 61 percent of registered Kentucky voters had an unfavorable impression of Obamacare. Only 17 percent had negative feelings about Kynect."

Friday, June 5, 2015

Citing costs, Bevin has said he would shut down Kynect; actually, insurance companies pay for it; Medicaid is another matter

By Molly Burchett and Al Cross
Kentucky Health News

The governor's race between Democrat Jack Conway and Republican Matt Bevin will spotlight the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, an issue that affects all Kentuckians at least indirectly.

Conway, in his eighth year as attorney general, says he would have voted for the law. Bevin, who was the most conservative candidate in his primary, has said he would shut down the state's health-insurance exchange, Kynect, that was established under the law, because it will cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars.

Actually, Kynect is paid for by insurance companies that sell policies in Kentucky. Bevin appears to be referring to the projected cost of expanding Medicaid, another Obamacare-related move that Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear made at the same time he created Kynect. It raised the program's income limit to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, from 69 percent.

The federal government is paying the entire cost of the Medicaid expansion for the first three years. In 2017, the state will pay 3 percent, gradually rising to the law's cap of 10 percent in 2020. A study for the state projects that the expansion will pay for itself until 2021 by expanding health-care jobs and generating economic activity and tax revenue.

Bevin has scoffed at those projections. Conway has said the state needs to provide health coverage, but only what it can afford.

As Kentuckians, voters, and consumers of health insurance, you may be asking: What's going on with Obamacare in the state? Are we able to afford it? Who and what should we believe? While the cost of Medicaid expansion is debatable, it's becoming clear that Kynect has avoided the problems plaguing other state-run exchanges.

So far, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has dispensed more than $4.9 billion in grants to help launch state-run exchanges. Kentucky received $253 million for the initial planning and development phases of Kynect. Now its $28 million annual cost is covered by a fee on insurance companies, state officials say.

Despite federal support and their own revenue sources, many of the 17 state-based exchanges are expecting deficits this year and in the future. Many will continue to rely on leftover federal funds to pay for operations this year, report Darius Tahir and Paul Demko of Modern Healthcare. Hawaii announced this week that it would close its exchange and transfer clients to the federal exchange because of continued funding problems.
Kynect officials say it isn't having such problems because the state has ensured that Kynect is self-supporting through fees on insurance plans.

"The governor committed that the exchange would be self-supporting and would not rely on state General Fund dollars," said Jill Midkiff, spokeswoman for the Cabinet for Health and Family Services. "Kentucky’s sustainability plan employs an existing assessment on insurers that was previously used to fund Kentucky Access, the state’s high-risk pool, which was closed [since] individuals previously enrolled are now eligible to purchase a plan through Kynect."

But to transform Kentucky Access into Kynect, Beshear used executive orders that bypassed the General Assembly, where Republicans control the Senate. They have questioned his use of executive powers but generally have not been critical of Kynect.

The fee on insurers is a 1 percent, broad-based assessment on companies offering plans through the exchange. While insurers don't pass this fee directly to consumers, it almost certainly figures into their calculation of premium calculation and thus is indirectly paid by policyholders. The federal exchange is financed in a similar way, but its fee is 3.5 percent, meaning higher costs for insurers and policyholders.

In most cases, premiums for Kynect policies are reduced by a federal income-tax subsidy that is a key part of Obamacare.

"The vast majority of Kentuckians buying health insurance through Kynect are eligible for some kind of payment assistance or subsidy," Beshear said in commenting on most health-insurance companies recent requests for premium increases. "That cost will vary from family to family, so talking about rate changes in a vacuum isn’t a very effective way to gauge how much those rate fluctuations may affect policyholders or those shopping for insurance."

Bevin says he would move Kynect customers to the federal exchange, but the U.S. Supreme Court could rule this month that the tax subsidies are not supposed to be available through the federal exchange. The plaintiffs in the case cite a passage of the law that opponents say was a drafting error and does not make sense when the law is viewed as a whole.

If the court agrees with the plaintiffs, and Congress doesn't change the law, states using the federal exchanges will see spikes in insurance premiums, and millions of people could be at risk of losing their insurance. Bevin has not said what he would do in case of such a ruling.

Independent Drew Curtis is also running for governor.

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

Most insured through Kynect will pay more in 2016; Kentucky Health Cooperative seeks 25 percent increase

By Molly Burchett
Kentucky Health News

The federal health law requires that insurers planning to significantly increase premiums for policies on a health-insurance exchange to submit their rates by June 1 for review. Many insurance carriers across the country, including four in Kentucky, are requesting double-digit increases in insurance premiums for 2016.

For the individual market, the requested average rates from companies already participating in the Kynect exchange are:
  • Anthem Health Plans, 14.6 percent increase;
  • CareSource Kentucky, 11.8 percent increase;
  • Humana Inc., 5.2 percent increase;
  • Kentucky Health Cooperative, 25.1 percent increase;
  • WellCare Health Plans, a 9.28 percent decrease.
The rates are not final, but are subject to approval by the state Department of Insurance, "so we don’t yet know what the final numbers will be," Gov. Steve Beshear said. "Changes still may occur. Rates should be finalized sometime in mid-July. We do expect that some plan rates will go down, some will go up and some will stay close to the same as last year."

Consumers will have more choices when enrollment opens, because the exchange is adding three new insurers to its individual market. United Healthcare will be offering coverage statewide, Aetna policies will be available in 10 counties, and Baptist Health Plan, now Bluegrass Family Health, will offer coverage in 79 counties. CareSource will expand its coverage area from 16 to 67 counties.

With these additions, at least three insurers will be offering Kynect coverage in every county, said Ronda Sloan of the Department of Insurance.

"When open enrollment begins this fall, Kentuckians should seek information about their individual plans, not average costs," Beshear said. "System-wide averages don’t give a good picture of what an individual’s out-of-pocket costs may be."

It is also important to keep in mind that premiums cannot be viewed in isolation, and you should look at the individual market dynamics that impact how much consumers pay for their health care coverage.

Why are most rates going up?

For an insurance company to survive, its cost of providing benefits should be less than the premiumums paid for those benefits. Companies now have had more than a full year of claims data to inform pricing structures, and many insurers are finding that people who buy policies on exchanges are considerably older and sicker than anticipated, reports Megan McArdle of Bloomberg News.

As a result, insurers are incurring greater costs of providing benefits than expected. Initially, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said that about 40 percent of the exchange policies should be bought by people between 18 and 35, the most healthy age group, to keep the exchanges financially stable. However, according to HHS data, that group accounted for only 28 percent of the policies in 2014 and 2015.

Not only do older people have more complex and more costly health needs, rising premiums in some state-based exchanges are due in part to the uncertainty in the overall health-insurance marketplace. First, there is much uncertainly about the reform law's "risk corridor program," which was designed to have insurers share the financial risk of offering policies on Obamacare exchanges from 2014 through 2016.

The program creates a pool of money to reduce risk for insurers: Those that pay out less in benefits than they collect in premiums pay into the pool; those whose premiums don't cover the cost of providing benefits take money from the pool. However, a recent Standard & Poor's report says the risk corridor will probably not get enough money from insurers with profitable exchange plans, so many insurers must raise premiums to support themselves.

Kentucky Health Cooperative needs shoring up

In another potentially worrisome sign, some insurers had risk-corridor receivables that exceeded half of their reported capital, and Kentucky Health Cooperative had the second-highest level of receivables as a percentage of capital: 117 percent, reports CNBC. That helps explain why it has asked for the largest average increase in premiums this year, 25 percent, and last year, 20 percent. The cooperative is one of several start-ups funded by the reform law to encourage competition in states; it sells most of the 106,000 private policies on Kynect.

Other reasons for the overall premium increases include rising health-care costs, especially for prescription drugs, Larry Levitt, senior vice president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, said on "PBS NewsHour" Wednesday night.

Speaking nationally, Levitt said state regulation means the requested premiums "will come down, in some cases by a lot." He said "Insurers are jockeying for position in these new marketplaces [so] there are some good deals to be had, but consumers really have to look around,"

David Blumenthal, president of The Commonwealth Fund, which researches health and social policy, said exchanges like Kynect "give people the ability to comparison-shop much more easily than before."

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Beshear is Communicator of the Year for efforts with Kynect

Governor Steve Beshear ​has been named 2014 Communicator of the Year by ​the Public Relations Society of America's Thoroughbred chapter.

He received the award for his communication to Kentucky residents about Kynect, the state's online healthcare marketplace created under federal health-care reform.

More than half a million Kentuckians have gotten coverage through Kynect, most of them through Medicaid, which Beshear expanded under the federal law.

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Higher-income Kentuckians' reported health keeps declining; reports from those with lower incomes go up, marginally

A statewide poll again finds that Kentuckians with higher incomes consider themselves in better health than those with lower incomes.

The latest Kentucky Health Issues Poll, taken Oct. 8 through Nov. 6, found that 55 percent of Kentucky adults who are above 200 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) said their health was either "excellent" or "very good," compared to 29 percent of Kentucky adults at or below 200 percent of the FPL. The FPL for a family of four in 2014 was $47,700.

However, the percentage of Kentucky adults in the higher-income category reporting excellent or very good health has dropped significantly since the poll started asking this question in 2008, to 55 percent in 2014 from 66 percent in 2008. So has the overall percentage of Kentucky adults reporting excellent or very good health, dropping to 41 percent in 2014 from 49 percent in 2008.

The percentage of lower-income Kentucky adults reporting excellent or very good has been about the same since 2008. This year the poll found a 3 percent increase among those in this group who reported very good or excellent health. The difference is not statistically significant, but coincides with implementation of federal health reform, and and if it continues could show the law's impact.

The poll also found that 52 percent of adults age 45 and younger considered their health as excellent or very good while 33 percent of those over age 45 reported excellent or very good health.


“KHIP provides important data regarding the connections among a person’s age, earnings level and perceived health status,” said Susan Zepeda, president and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, which co-sponsored the poll. “By asking the same question year to year, we can spot trends in perceived health. The latest results are an important reminder of the links between poverty and poor health.”

The poll is conducted by the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Cincinnati and is co-sponsored by Interact for Health, formerly the Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati. It surveyed a random sample of 1,597 adults via land lines and cell phones, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points. That applies to each figure, making the 3 percent difference statistically insignifcant.

Sunday, April 5, 2015

New diabetes cases in expanded-Medicaid states much higher than other states; 46,000 new Ky. Medicaid clients got screened

By Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

New diabetes cases among poor Americans are much more numerous in Kentucky and other states that have embraced the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a medical testing company has found. The diagnoses rose 23 percent in the Obamacare states and barely rose in the others, apparently because state Medicaid programs are encouraging screening for diabetes.

Quest Diagnostics conducted the study by analyzing laboratory test results from all 50 states and the District of Columbia in its large database over two six-month periods, Sabrina Tavernise reports for The New York Times. The authors determined that because in January 2014, 26 states and the District of Columbia had expanded Medicaid and 24 had not, it was a good time to conduct this study, which is reported in the journal Diabetes Care.

The research team used the results of the basic test for diabetes, which measures a form of hemoglobin that has interacted with glucose, A1c. "In the states that expanded Medicaid, the number of Medicaid enrollees with newly identified diabetes rose by 23 percent, to 18,020 in the first six months of 2014, from 14,625 in the same period in 2013," Tavernise reports. "The diagnosis rose by only 0.4 percent — to 11,653 from 11,612 — in the states that did not expand Medicaid."

A Kentucky study indicates that more screening isn't the only reason for such numbers; the Medicaid expansion population appears to be more susceptible to diabetes than normal.

The study by Deloitte Consulting found that chronic conditions, including diabetes, were more than twice as prevalent in the expansion population than other people of the same age and gender who were on Medicaid before it expanded. That comparative group was considered to be the group most similar to the Medicaid expansion population, since the state lacks historical data for the expansion group.

The study found that the Medicaid expansion group had a 102.5 percent higher prevalence of diabetes than the comparative group. About two of every 1,000 in the expansion group had diabetes, compared to one of every 1,000 members of the traditional-Medicaid group.

About 46,000 of the 400,000 people in the expansion group had a diabetes screening in the first year of the expansion. Both studies suggest better access and utilization of preventive care and early diagnosis will promote earlier treatment and better long-term outcomes.

Kentucky ranks 17th among the states in prevalence of diabetes, according to the 2014 "States of Obesity" report.  The state Cabinet for Health and Family Services reports an estimated 233,000 adult Kentuckians have pre-diabetes. For county-by-county data on diabetes, click here.

Quest Diagnostics recognized that its study only looked at changes in raw numbers of the lab results from one company and did not have access to a federal data set. This has caused some to voice skepticism that the study results are a result of the Medicaid expansion. Others, while recognizing that the study did not "have the precision of a scientific drug trial," Tavernise writes, said "the changes in the numbers are real ... 23 percent versus zero," and that "the health-care law was the most plausible explanation for the findings." Another said, "for an observational study, it’s really very strong."

Kentucky Health News is an independent news service of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues, based in the School of Journalism and Telecommunications at the University of Kentucky, with support from the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

Auditor will hold meetings in Prestonsburg, Princeton and Sonerset to discuss his report on financial status of rural hospitals

State Auditor Adam Edelen will hold three public meetings in rural communities to discuss the findings of his special report about the financial health of rural hospitals.

The meetings will be held Monday, April 21 at 1 p.m. at the Mountain Arts Center in Prestonsburg; Monday, May 4 at 11 a.m. (CT) at the Caldwell County Memorial Hospital in Princeton; and Thursday, May 6 at 1 p.m. at the Liberty center of Somerset Community College.

The report, which covers fiscal years 2011 through 2013, found that as many as one-third of Kentucky's rural hospitals were in poor financial shape, with 68 percent of them ranking below the national average financially.

“Although closure may be an unfortunate reality for some," Edelen said in the press conference, "I believe more can and should be done to help these hospitals rethink their models of business in delivering health care in the 21st century." He went on to suggest rural hospitals consider hiring outside managers, merge with larger hospitals, form coalitions with other rural hospitals or find a specialized health niche as possible alternate business models to consider.

The report calls for the creation of a state work group to monitor rural hospitals, including making sure state law gives them the flexibility to retool their business models. Susan Zepeda, president and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, suggested that the proposed work "could be incorporated into the work already under way under a State Innovation Model grant, which is engaging many sectors of health service in Kentucky in an ambitious, collaborative redesign effort."

Edelen said some of the primary problems faced by rural hospitals stem from the many changes in health care since the inception of Medicaid managed care, a decrease in the number of health-care providers, and an economic climate in some areas that doesn't support the current health payment model, which depends on the majority of its users to have private health insurance.

The report suggested that the Cabinet for Health and Family Services negotiate better contracts with managed-care organizations as it approaches the June 30 deadline, especially to address provider payments, stricter penalties for non-compliance and increased administrative burdens that managed care has put on hospitals. Edelen and Haynes sounded hopeful that this was going to happen.

Gov. Steve Beshear called Edelen's report "a dated snapshot" because the 2013 data used in the report does not include 2014 information,when the federal health reform was fully implemented through expansion of Medicaid to people with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty line. Beshear said hospitals received $506 million to care for such people in 2014 while seeing significant reductions in losses on patients who couldn't or wouldn't pay.

Edelen's spokeswoman, Stephenie Hoelscher, said in an email that Edelen believes the full effect of all the changes in health care to hospitals' bottom line is still not clear, and his report establishes a baseline for critical analysis going forward.

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Community health groups, with focus on prevention, fight to be part of new setup for lowering health costs, improving outcomes

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is forcing doctors and hospitals to collaborate on lowering health-care costs while improving health outcomes. Community health groups that focus on preventive care are battling to be included as part of the solution, Laura Ungar reports for The Courier-Journal and USA Today.

One way physicians and hospitals are coming together to "reduce the duplication of services and keep large groups of patients well" is by forming accountable care organizations. Community health groups are having to fight for a "seat at the table" in these "doctor-dominated boards of ACOs," Ungar writes.

Such groups often offer less expensive, non-medical solutions for preventive health, according to a 2014 report by a North Carolina physicians' coalition. Some ACOs are beginning to include them as partners, but Bo Bobbitt, a Raleigh health-care lawyer who was lead author of the report, told Ungar, "The bad news is that the gap between the medical system treating illness and disease and the community health system was larger than we had feared."

Jose Pagan, a health economist who directs the New York Academy of Medicine's Center for Health Innovation, told Ungar that another key challenge is that doctors and hospitals are going to keep working to keep the money flowing their way. "If you go to a surgeon for a solution, they're not going to give you massage therapy," he says. "There's going to be progress, but it's going to be very slow."

Traditionally U.S. health care has focused its attention on "costly medical intervention," Ungar reports, instead of lifestyle changes, with only 3 percent of the $2.6 trillion health-care budget being spent public health and prevention, despite preventable chronic conditions accounting for 75 percent of medical care, according to a 2012 Institute of Medicine report.

"Compared to even the best medical therapy, we can decrease heart attacks, strokes and deaths by between 35 percent and 45 percent by changing lifestyle," Paul Rogers, a Louisville cardiologist at one of KentuckyOne Health System's healthy lifestyle centers, told Ungar.

For example, losing about 10 percent of weight reduces cardiac risks significantly, and losing 15 to 20 percent begins to reverse diabetes, lowers blood pressure, improves sleep and improves cholesterol level, Rogers said.

Another challenge for community-based programs is that little money goes into research on wellness programs, "and without studies, few will invest in their programs," Ungar notes.

Some members of Congress don't see nutrition, physical fitness or stop-smoking campaigns as health funding and gripe about the "nanny factor," Georges Benjamin, a physician who is executive director of the American Public Health Association, told Ungar.

As a result, "annual funding authorized by the ACA for the Prevention and Public Health Fund was supposed to hit $2 billion starting in 2015 but won't reach that level until at least 2022," Ungar reports.

Lifestyle changes are known to help chronic conditions, and Ungar gives many examples in the article. Here is one: Kevin French, 57, a construction contractor in Louisville, told Ungar that he began having chest pain and had to have two stents implanted in his heart in 1993.  And through cardiac rehab, he learned that his previous eating habits, which included lots of fast food, lack of exercise and smoking, played a big part in his heart problems. But with the help of the healthy lifestyle center, he said he  has "basically changed everything" about  his lifestyle and that's "improved not only his health but his family's as well."

Monday, March 9, 2015

Obamacare requires mental-health coverage to be at parity with other coverage, but 1/4 of plans don't do that, study concludes

Federal health reform "has improved access to mental health care for thousands of Kentuckians, but coverage for that care remains unequal to what people get for physical illnesses despite a federal law requiring parity and a promise that health reform would level the playing field," report Laura Ungar and Jayne O'Donnell of USA Today.

"If you need to see a cardiologist, the insurance company doesn't say you're not allowed to see the cardiologist more than a certain number of times. With behavioral health, you commonly see a limit on the visits you get," Tony Zipple, CEO of Seven Counties Services, the Louisville region's largest mental-health care provider, told Ungar, who also works for The Courier-Journal. "Behavioral health nationally is treated like a smaller part of health care."

Ungar and O'Donnell cite a study by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health that found consumer information on one-fourth of plans offered under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act appeared to violate a federal law "designed to stop discrimination in coverage for people with mental-health or addiction problems," they write. "This makes it nearly impossible for consumers to find the best plan to cover their mental health needs, the research suggests."

Researchers found that different co-pays or deductibles for mental and physical health services, and more stringent requirements for authorizations from insurers before patients can get mental health services, may discourage people from buying such plans, said Colleen Barry, lead author of the study report, published in the journal Psychiatric Services. "She's concerned insurers have an incentive to do that because covering people who use mental health services tends to be more expensive," the story reports.

Clare Krusing, a spokeswoman for the lobby America's Health Insurance Plans, "said the rules contained some important changes affecting plan design that were only required for insurance plan years that started on or after July 1, 2014," the story reports. "Krusing added that it's unfair to say a plan doesn't offer mental health parity based only on what consumers see before buying the plans," and not the history of claims made under the plans.

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky wants a claims database to increase transparency about health-care cost and quality in Ky.

Kentucky has experienced rapid changes in health care since the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and the next step is to implement a program that will provide more transparency about the cost and quality of health care so consumers can make informed, value-based health decisions, says a news release from the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

A recent Kentucky Health Issues poll found that most Kentuckians think they can find out what doctors charge for treatments and procedures if they need this information. They seem to believe that transparency already exists, but this is often not the case.

The foundation recommends that Kentucky develop and establish an all-payer claims database, or APCD, for consumers and stakeholders as a tool to address this issue of price transparency.

"Clear, factual information about the cost and quality of health care is necessary for consumers to select value-driven care and for consumers and providers to be involved and accountable in their decision about their health and health care services," says the release.

The APCD Council defines APCDs as “large-scale databases that systematically collect health-care claims data from a variety of payer sources which include claims from most health-care providers," says the news release. The information includes patient demographics, provider codes, and clinical, financial and utilization data. This information is then made available to the public.

The foundation said it analyzed national and state expert presentations, reviewed studies and held a meeting in October with more than 60 Kentucky leaders in government, business, policy and health care to discuss the issue.

Participants discussed barriers, feasibility, solutions and other factors in implementing price transparency in Kentucky from the perspectives of the consumer, provider, policymaker and researchers. Here are some of their collective findings, according to the release:
  • Current cost and health service information are difficult to understand. 
  • Price and quality data need to be useful to the consumer through simple, useful tools, currently it is not. 
  • The state must be involved in implementing an APCD by passing laws to require the collection and sharing of data and requiring the data to be reported publicly. 
  • An effective APCD would allow estimates and cost comparisons between providers; would include expected out-of-pocket costs and quality measures that can be compared across providers; would have the ability to see spending patterns over time for all enrolled under one policy; would offer individual level data; and would offer health care value-based cost saving tips.
  • There is a significant variation in health-care pricing, and physicians may need an incentive to consider cost when making decisions for patients.
Colorado was one of the first states to establish price transparency legislation, data collection and reporting on a state-wide level. Representatives from that state's APCD said it was initially funded by foundations, but will use fees to sustain itself going forward.

Bill to cap co-payments for drugs is backed by emotional testimony, but opposed by health insurers and employer groups

By Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

FRANKFORT, Ky. -- People with chronic conditions are often denied the best medication for their condition because it is not on their insurance plan's preferred formulary, which makes the co-payment more for that medication than they can afford.

Sen. Tom Buford
Senate Bill 31, sponsored by Tom Buford, R-Nicholasville, would put a $100-per-month cap on co-payments for a 30-day supply of a medication for drugs subject to a tiered formulary, and not to exceed $200 per month total for all medications. House Bill 146, sponsored by Rep. James Kay, D-Versailles, has a similar bill that is currently in the House Banking and Insurance committee.

The Senate Health and Welfare Committee heard discussion on this bill Feb. 25, which opened with an impassioned plea from Buford to pass it. He said 18 states have passed or are in the process of passing similar bills. But they face strong opposition from the insurance industry and employers, and the bill has been on the committee agenda "for discussion only."

Buford said insurance companies have avoided big increases in premiums by raising co-payments, "which have gone over 54 percent and some 80 percent." Saying the average salary of Kentuckians is $23,700, he said many have to chose between living expenses and paying for medicine. "You may have insurance, but you may not have health care," he said.

The state Department of Insurance estimates that the bill would increase premiums by $3.20 to $4 per month and, because of greater utilization of services, raise the ultimate health-care costs of all insured Kentuckians (except those on state plans) by $2.58 to 3.23 per month.

Buford disputed the estimate, saying it essentially comes from the insurance industry. He acknowledged that capping co-pays would raise costs, but said the increase could be modest. He said that after Vermont passed a cap, the cost averaged only 32 cents per month per member for large-group plans and 74 cents per month for small-group plans.

Tom Underwood, state director of the National Federation of Independent Business, said the bill would primarily affect small-group employers, partly because small businesses have no power to negotiate with insurance companies.

Julie Davis of Glasgow, who has epilepsy, told the committee that she was forced to switch insurance this year, and a $60-per-month medication that she had been taking for seizures now cost $1,200 per month. She said they made her switched to a generic medicine, against the advice of her neurologist, and since has had her first breakthrough seizure in two and one-half years.

Getting emotional, Davis said that when she has such seizures, "I am out of commission for almost a month" and this has forced her to give up a job that she loved, move in order to be closer to a support group, and only allows her to work from home. She also said that at times she "fears for her life," and her insurance company has denied her appeals.

Deb McGrath of the Epilepsy Foundation said it had found that the most commonly prescribed and effective epilepsy drugs are on the non-preferred list of the "silver" plans on the state health-insurance exchange, the most common type of plan. A patient must pay a 40 percent co-insurance or a high deductible plus a co-pay to get a preferred drug on these plans.

She said the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has called the practice of limiting coverage and imposing high cost-sharing for drugs that treat certain conditions "discriminatory."

McGrath said, "These barriers make it impossible, near impossible, for individuals, for those living with chronic health conditions like epilepsy, like arthritis, Alzheimers, crones disease, diabetes, and AIDS access to care that they desperately need."

Carl Breeding, a lobbyist for American Health Insurance Plans, gave the committee a letter from the Insurance Commissioner Sharon Clark, which he summarized as saying this bill would "prevent the state from being able to work" under federal health reform because of the way deductibles work and would "eliminate the bronze plan," the lowest-cost plan.

But Mark Guimond, a lobbyist for the Arthritis Foundation, said the lack of co-pay caps can increase costs because the resulting lack of medication can lead to hospitalizations, surgeries and time off work. "These are extremely expensive medications: $1000, $2000, $3000 a month," Guimond said, and patients "are being stuck with co-pays or co-insurance that may be 30-40-50 percent of these amounts."

The Kentucky Association of Manufacturers, which opposes the bill, wrote in the Lexington Herald-Leader that "These increased costs take away capital that state manufacturers could otherwise deploy to reinvest in their plants and more importantly remain competitive globally, so that we can continue to employ hard-working Kentuckians."

In animated remarks to the committee, Buford replied, "I hate to say this, but I could care less if we beat Japan in making toys if it depends on someone's life and health and the ability for them to live. It's more important apparently for some to deny the insurance than it is to make that profit on the bottom line of their company."

Friday, February 20, 2015

Almost 103,000 Kentuckians now on private health insurance through Kynect, state says

More than 158,000 Kentuckians signed up for private health insurance or Medicaid coverage in the second round of open enrollment under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

The signup total of 158,685 as of Feb. 19 included almost 103,000 Kentuckians who renewed or bought private coverage. The state said the total broke down this way:
  • 55,855 enrolled in Medicaid coverage (which is open year-round).
  • 75,760 individuals renewed enrollment in private insurance.
  • 27,070 individuals newly enrolled in private insurance.
  • 6,009 individuals enrolled in dental plans.
“We had a tremendously successful second open enrollment period, with many new individuals signing up or continuing their health coverage through Kynect,” the state's health-insurance marketplace, Gov. Steve Beshear said in a news release. “When people get health insurance, they generally take immediate steps to get healthier, which will help our workforce get even stronger.”

Thursday, February 12, 2015

Thousands of Kentuckians face federal tax penalty for not having health insurance

"Thousands of Kentuckians might face a penalty this tax season for failing to sign up for health insurance during 2014," Mary Meehan reports for the Lexington Herald-Leader.

The state estimated that 340,000 Kentuckians would buy private insurance through its Kynect marketplace, but only 80,000 have done so. However, Meehan writes, some of those who did "might have qualified for Medicaid under the state's expanded income guidelines, said Carrie Banahan, who heads Kynect."

Jill Midkiff, spokesman for the state Cabinet for Health and Family Services, told Meehan, "There are too many variables at play here to do simple arithmetic for estimated populations. It would be safe to say that thousands of Kentuckians will likely face a tax penalty this year for not obtaining health insurance."

Banahan said, "A lot of people are going to be very surprised." And that will include some people who were eligible for Medicaid, but didn't enroll in it. Medicaid enrollment is open year-round, but private-insurance enrollment closes Sunday, Feb. 15 and won't reopen until next fall unless someone has a life-changing event "such as a birth, divorce or loss of a job," Meehan notes.

"The penalty for not having insurance during 2014 is $95 for each person in a household or 1 percent of the household income, whichever is higher," Meehan notes. "The bill will come due when 2014 taxes are filed, she said. If a person is due a refund, it will be deducted from the tax refund." Next year, the penalty will be 2 percent, with a minimum of $325 per adult or $162.50 per child, under provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Friday, January 30, 2015

Kynect private-insurance enrollment runs through Feb. 15; exchange works to get taxpayers information to prove coverage

With the close of open enrollment coming Feb. 15, state officials are making a final push to get Kentuckians to enroll in Medicaid or buy private, subsidized health insurance on the state's health benefits exchange, Kynect.

The federal health reform law requires most people to have health insurance or pay a penalty, and Kynect says it is working to help Kentuckians get the information they need to prove coverage when they file their tax returns.


Outreach events continue at several campuses in the Kentucky Community and Technical College System. Events are open to the general public and will feature "Kynectors" who answer questions and help people find a plan that fits their needs and budgets. Tthe remaining events will be at:
  • Bluegrass Community and Technical College, Leestown and Newtown campuses, 10 a.m.–2 p.m., Feb. 2 and 3.
  • Jefferson Community and Technical College, downtown Louisville campus, 10 a.m.–2 p.m., Feb. 4 and 5.
  • Gateway Community and Technical College, Covington campus (Two Rivers Building), 10 a.m.–2 p.m., Feb. 9 and 10.
  • Gateway Community and Technical College, Boone County campus, 10 a.m.–2 p.m., Feb. 11 and 12.
As of 3:30 p.m. Jan. 29, 50,754 new applications for coverage had been submitted to Kynect; 43,181 people had been newly enrolled in Medicaid; 75,760 people had renewed their private insurance; 18,533 had newly enrolled in a private plan; and 4,914 individuals had enrolled in dental plans.

Kynect Director Carrie Banahan said, “If you or anyone you know remains without health insurance the time to enroll in coverage through Kynect is now. Please don’t delay. Enroll as soon as possible.”

Those who need health insurance are encouraged to log on to www.Kynect.ky.govcall 1-855-4kynect (459-6328), or contact an insurance agent or Kynector before the Feb. 15 deadline. Medicaid enrollment is open year-round.

Taxpayers, take note

Individuals who qualified for an advanced premium tax credit, or subsidy, through Kynect will receive a 1095-A tax form in the mail. The form provides information for individuals and families who received payment assistance to help them fill out IRS Form 8962 as part of their federal return.

"Kynect has instituted a robust training and information program to help individuals, Kynectors, insurance agents and tax preparers understand the requirements," a state press release said. "Individuals with questions about their Form 1095-A may also call a special Kynect hotline at 1-844-373-2417.

Individuals with Medicaid, KCHIP, Medicare, catastrophic health insurance or insurance through an employer or other agency do not need Form 1095-A to file their federal income taxes. 

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Almost as many Kentuckians support health reform as oppose it, but half say they don't know how it may affect them

By Al Cross and Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

The federal health-reform law is gaining support from Kentuckians, to the point that they are almost evenly divided about it.

Those are among the results of the latest Kentucky Health Issues Poll, conducted for the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky among a random sample of almost 1,600 Kentucky adults Oct. 8 through Nov. 6, the final month of an election season in which the law was an issue.

After two years in which opinion of the law was clearly unfavorable, the poll found that 39 percent view it favorably while 41 percent view it unfavorably. That is well within the poll's error margin of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points, which applies to both numbers.

The findings are similar to a national survey taken at about the same time. The October 2014 Kaiser Health Tracking Poll found that 36 percent of U.S. adults had favorable views of the law; 43 percent were unfavorable, and 20 percent did not know or offered no opinion.

In the Kentucky poll, about as many people reported a negative impact from the law (21 percent) as a positive impact (18 percent). The positive-impact number rose form 7 percent in the 2013 poll, which was taken just after enrollment for expanded Medicaid and subsidized health insurance had opened.

Notably, 51 percent of those polled said they didn't have enough information to know how the law would affect them personally. That was down from 57 percent a year earlier.

Most of those who reported not having enough information, 64 percent, had not graduated from high school. Almost half of Kentuckians (47 percent) said they understood how the law would impact them personally. Sixty-six percent said the law had no effect on them.

“KHIP data trends show overall support for the ACA has risen since 2013 as more Kentuckians have gotten information about the law," Susan Zepeda, President and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, said in a press release. "More work is needed to educate people about the law’s provisions and potential impacts on families.”

The poll was also conducted for Interact for Health, formerly the Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, by the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Cincinnati. It used landline and cell phones.

Opinions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, often called Obamacare, are still driven partly by politics. The survey found that 58 percent of Democrats had favorable views of the law and 64 of Republicans had unfavorable views. Among independents, 42 percent had unfavorable views and 31 percent were favorable.

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Advocates must sell reform as political winds blow, Luallen says

By Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

Advocates of health reform must arm themselves with information about its success in Kentucky to fight back against its critics as the 2015 gubernatorial election looms, Lt. Gov. Crit Luallen told them at the Kentucky Voices for Health annual meeting Jan. 12.

Lt. Gov. Crit Luallen
"Improving our state's health is not a task that can be accomplished in months. It doesn't fit with the cycles of gubernatorial administrations," Luallen said, alluding to the upcoming election and those for the legislature in 2016.

"I have seen time and again that Kentucky fails to remain on course for the sustained commitment that it takes to successfully tackle our toughest challenges. Too often in the past, we've let political posturing derail our efforts, too often we take the easy course when faced with difficult decisions."

She added, "We have the opportunity to truly change the future of Kentucky if we can cement these reforms in a way that has lasting and sustainable impact. But the key to that sustained commitment is your voices being strong when the political winds make staying strong during the course difficult."

Luallen, who has worked for six Kentucky governors, said governors often slow down during their last year of service, but she said this might be Gov. Steve Beshear's "most important year" as he works to keep his health initiatives moving forward.

She listed many of the results: increased health coverage for children and low-income working families, expanded mental health and substance abuse treatments, increased cancer screenings, 114,000 people already signed up for health coverage in the second enrollment period, and 12,000 new jobs created in Kentucky health care because expansion of Medicaid and subsidies for private coverage have expanded the health-care industry.

In the longer term, she said, "The meaningful reforms we have implemented will lead to a higher quality of life, better attendance at school, a stronger work record and less chance of bankruptcy due to illness or disease, but only if we stay the course."

Luallen reminded the advocates, many of who are paid lobbyists, to also talk about the challenges that remain with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

One of the biggest concerns critics have about the law is that Kentucky won't be able to pay for its share the care for newly eligible Medicaid patients, which will start in 2017 and reach the law's limit of 10 percent in 2020.

Beshear says the expansion will pay for itself, based on a study by the Pricewaterhouse Coopers accounting firm and the University of Louisville's Urban Studies Institute. However, the newly-eligible Medicaid enrollment last year was more than double the original projection, nearing levels that had been predicted would not be seen until 2020, and the 12,000 jobs are about two-thirds of the total projected by that time.

Beshear has ordered up a new study, using a year's experience, which Luallen said is to be completed by the end of January. She said that the economic impact of the law could be higher than first expected "because we have seen more people sign up, especially in the Medicaid arena, which means more federal dollars flowing to the state."

Luallen said that when critics say, "We can't afford to do it," advocates should say, "Yes we can!"

By virtue of her office, to which Beshear appointed her when Jerry Abramson resigned to take a White House job, Luallen heads Kyhealthnow, an aggressive plan to improve Kentuckians' health, with seven measurable goals, over the next five years. "We will be looking for partners as we work to transition Kyhealthnow's mission beyond this administration," she said.

On perhaps the most pressing health issue of the moment, a proposed statewide smoking ban, Luallen said there is increased interest in the House and more support in the Republican-controlled Senate, where the ban has never even made it out of committee. "We believe that this truly has a chance of passing this session," she said, "if we can all speak with one voice and get behind it and make the case that there is not a single thing we can do that would have bigger impact in this state's health statistics than to lower the rate of smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke."

Luallen is a colon cancer survivor and has lost her mother, two brothers, two aunts and an uncle to cancer. She said that her personal experience gives her a unique perspective in understanding the devastating effects of cancer in Kentucky and has contributed to her passion for health policy. Kentucky ranks first for cancer and cancer deaths.

She said, “I often say that people in Kentucky fall into one of two groups, those who have been touched by cancer and those who have not been touched yet.”